Friday 28 October 2016

week 7:story 14

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/twitter-is-cutting-nearly-a-tenth-of-its-staff_uk_58120c86e4b04660a438503f?utm_hp_ref=uk-media

Image result for twitterTwitter Is Cutting Nearly A Tenth Of Its Staff After A Slower Quarter






The article looks at why Twitter had to lay off 9% of its workforce. Twitter has recently seen a fall in profits for a while now and the last quarter is the main reason why it has to do so. The 9% job cuts has also meant that they have had to let Vine go, it has now seen interest from some unusual companies who are looking to buy. However, Twitter has seen a rise in average monthly users which comes as a surprise as they were recently taken over in users by Instagram.

It is surprising to see such a large relatively new digital social media company having to lay people off, however there is such fierce competition now as virtually anyone can release an app that aims at copying others, there's so many now it's hard to regulate.

week 7:story 13

http://www.irishtimes.com/business/media-and-marketing/newspaper-sales-decline-in-first-half-of-2016-1.2760884

Newspaper sales decline in first half of 2016


This article looks at the statistics of the decline in the newspaper industry in Ireland. It's not so different to anywhere else and like everywhere else it is seeing declines along with some anomalies.

  • Print circulation of the Irish times is down 5.5% year on year 
  • the growth in digital editions sales (at 103%) meant that the Irish times grew 1% year on year
  • The company is currently behind a paywall
  • papers on sunday has fell by an average of 6% across all companies, even those owned by Rupert Murdoch.

This will continue to happen at probably even larger rates but eventually it will slow down but that's maybe because of other reasons and not to do with the rise of digital media and maybe quality of work and so on.

Friday 21 October 2016

The decline in newspapers: MM case studies

1) Read the feature: 'A New Day for British journalism' on page 6 of Media Magazine 57 (our Media Magazine archive is here).

2) What was the New Day trying to achieve?
They set out to target a specific segment of the market, in particular 30-40 year old's and both women and men who wouldn't generally pick up a newspaper.

3) List the key statistics on the first page: how many people buy newspapers in the UK? How has this declined in the last year?

  • first standalone newspaper in over 30 years
  • over a million people have stopped buying the newspaper in the past two years
  • 6 million people buy a newspaper in Britain everyday 

4) What audience were the New Day trying to attract?
They were trying to attract an audience who didn't want to buy a newspaper and hoped that they would buy theirs.

5) Why do you think the New Day failed so spectacularly? There are several possible reasons listed in the article but do develop your own opinion here as well.
I think it's because they tried to start a newspaper in an already declining market. A high school business student could have told you that the chances of entering a declining market with something that isn't future proofed and being able to succeed is very little. The new day also had a very specific market segment it was targeting and if they weren't interested in the paper it would have ended a lot sooner.

1) Read the feature: 'Can The Guardian survive in a changing media landscape?' on page 9 of Media Magazine 57.

2) List the key statistics on page 10: How many unique digital browsers used the Guardian website in June 2016? What are The Guardian's latest print sales figures? How does this compare to the Telegraph? In terms of finances, how much did the Guardian lose in 2015?

  • explosive growth of the internet in the 90's
  • Guardian has 3rd most viewed website in the world
  • 120 million monthly unique browsers
  • daily average in June of around 9 million 
  • 5 million daily online readers more than the telegraph
  • print circulation for the guardian was only 161000
  • print circulation for the Daily telegraph was 472000
  • The guardian lost around £70 million 
  • cut backs of almost 20%



 

3) What has been The Guardian's strategy for reversing this decline?
The Guardian believe it's important to keep up it's global presence and aim to keep news stories updated 24/7, it shaped the way guardian readers use view it on mobile devices



4) What global event did The Guardian's digital coverage win awards for?
They won an award at the Press Awards 2015 for website of the year, the award always specified they had won it for coverage of the Paris shootings  coverage among other things.
5) In your opinion, will the global website strategy be enough to save The Guardian?

The global website strategy is a way to attract a larger audience and by combining all of its international sources under website name will indefinitely increase website traffic and this is such a good thing for advertisers when they see its doing well, meaning the Guardians future could be safe for now online.






Thursday 20 October 2016

week 6:story 12

http://www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-media/facebook-twitter-join-network-tackle-fake-news-n648041


Image result for facebook twitter and googleFacebook, Twitter Join Network to Tackle Fake News



This short article from NBC News looks at how many large media organisations including Alphabet, Facebook and Instagram are planning to come together with many other groups and companies to help validate and verify real news stories. They actually plan to launch this system by the end of October. The programme aims to also remove malicious content, just like Twitter did itself by removing disturbing extremist propaganda.

I think this is a step in the right direction as the amount of users of social media sites increase its going to be hard to know what to trust, however we placing our trust within these organisations to say what we should and shouldn't trust, mistakes can be made on there end no matter how fool-proof there IT systems are.


week 6:story 11

https://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2016/oct/17/donald-trump-as-president-would-be-a-threat-to-press-freedom

Donald Trump as president 'would be a threat to press freedom'

Donald Trump claims a “corrupt” media is seeking to rig the presidential election.

The article first looks at how the Trump campaign has insulted journalists and even singles some out and abused them. Recently he's also been very public about how he thinks the media is helping 'crooked Hillary' win/ rig the election. The article by Roy Greenslade also makes the presumption that if Trump got into power then the press across the US could be restricted and that could have a domino effect and that other countries outside the US would start to limit the power that the press have.

In my opinion I think that the idea of the new leader of the 'free world' restricting press seems blown out of proportion. I don't think news/press coverage could be restricted so that it goes against a leaders values (in a democracy) but in the case of Donald trump it does seem plausible. 

Monday 17 October 2016

NDM News: The future of journalism

1) Go to the Nieman Lab webpage (part of Harvard university) and watch the video of Clay Shirky presenting to Harvard students.

2) Play the clip AND read along with the transcript below to ensure you are following the argument. You need to watch from the beginning to 29.35 (the end of Shirky's presentation).

3) Why does Clay Shirky argue that 'accountability journalism' is so important and what example does he give of this?
The example he gives is about the Catholic Church and how they manipulated the system in order to protect their priests from being uncovered about abusing children. Accountability journalism comes into play when journalists hold those responsible for their actions and it forces them to admit what they've done, take responsibility and change their ways all in the public eye.

4) What does Shirky say about the relationship between newspapers and advertisers? Which websites does he mention as having replaced major revenue-generators for newspapers (e.g. jobs, personal ads etc.)?
We can link what Shirky says to business as what hes talking about when he says 'but it was an accident' means advertisers had no other choice but to go and settle for newspapers because they weren't going to make there money elsewhere even if they didn't believe in the stories that were being published. One of the main reasons why the newspaper is in decline is because naive and optimistic businesses thinking they were monopolies over invested in moving forwards, for example the creation of the ethernet cable and UI's.

5) Shirky talks about the 'unbundling of content'. This means people are reading newspapers in a different way. How does he suggest audiences are consuming news stories in the digital age?
Audiences are no longer waiting to be handed the news stories or activley go and view a news site, most people are following on from what other people have told them to view via social media, this leaves news companies struggling to reach a declining audience. Social media like twitter which was specifically mentioned plays a big part in creating and spreading news stories to share even more so then some news websites.

6) Shirky also talks about the power of shareable media. How does he suggest the child abuse scandal with the Catholic Church may have been different if the internet had been widespread in 1992?
He talked about it in a way that businesses use viral marketing to promote a good or service, that spreading that story via social media or E-mail to the same group of people whom the story affects could have caused the story to go viral much more quickly and may have reached unintended audiences, for example another religious group which could have caused them too investigate, similarly although unrelated the death of Jimmy Saville swept across social media and once they'd learned of his acts more and more celebrities were being uncovered by police, so was this the doing of the media audiences or accountability journalism.

7) Why does Shirky argue against paywalls?
One of the main points that stood out to me is what Shirky said about preventing an audiences ability to 'act as a publisher' although i agree with what most of Shirky is saying about not putting news behind a paywall i don't agree with him saying that because audiences have mostly unrestricted access to news that they shouldn't be able to publish themselves their view and own news stories, however there does have to be some middle ground because we can't t really expect the news industry to survive when were doing there jobs for them. He also argues that if all newspaper sites choose to go behind a paywall the this would cause audiences to suffer because of the power the news institutions would have as they would have the chance to collude and set prices and the rest of the industry would follow as people would pay for news because they see it as a necessity.

8) What is a 'social good'? In what way is journalism a 'social good'?
The idea of a social good in my opinion links to citizen journalism because Shirky also went on to talk about social production which means a group of people who come together and do something for themselves. This separated them from the normal mass market.

9) Shirky says newspapers are in terminal decline. How does he suggest we can replace the important role in society newspapers play? What is the short-term danger to this solution that he describes?
He says the newspapers are irreplaceable and that if you tried to come up with an idea of an organisation which could replace a newspaper it would most likely end up looking like a newspaper so the problem is not with the design of it and how it works to deliver news but more of how it operates in modern times. He says we have to agree the newspaper industry is of course irreplaceable but something needs to be done and one way he suggests is purely through experimentation, however a lot of companies are reluctant to do this as they don't want to take the risk.

10) Look at the first question and answer regarding institutional power. Give us your own opinion: how important is it that major media brands such as the New York Times or the Guardian continue to stay in business and provide news?
The NY Times and the Guardian are both extremely important, just because we live in a privileged society to be able to afford to view news and access it where we like doesn't mean we have to influence other people to follow our ways and get rid of the newspaper. Not even half the world have access to the internet and this can be seen not only in poorer nations but also in the UK where there is a digital divide among different age groups, just because everything else is progressing at a fast rate doesn't mean everyone else has to keep up. If newspapers were to dissappear next week across the world or even in the UK; billions would be affected and would be without news. If major institutions like the Guardian and the Times were to stop print production then others may stop too because they see these large institutions as leaders.


Thursday 13 October 2016

week 5:story 10

https://www.journalism.co.uk/news/app-for-journalists-pocketvideo-for-editing-clips-for-social-media/s2/a679638/

App for journalists: PocketVideo, for editing short videos for social media




This article mainly talks about the app in question, Pocket video. It goes through its functions and how it can be used by anyone. It talks about how you can optomise video for snapchat and YouTube which are now to major social media and video sharing sites where people tell the news and share the views and values.


This is surprising that it is almost being promoted by another journalist whilst a lot of them are saying how because anyone can pick up a phone and record something that it's lowering the quality of news reporting and putting there jobs in jeopardy. Obviously people have mixed reviews about this as some are welcoming apps like PocketVideo as they see it has a chance to further their careers but other people see it as a threat to theirs, it is both but in my opinion i do see it as a good thing because citizen journalism can gives us fast and some-what accurate news stories hours before they're even known about by large news institutions and journalists.