Monday, 16 January 2017

Identities and the Media: Reading the riots

  1. How did the language and selection of images in the coverage create a particular representation of young people? 
Young people came under scrutiny the most out of all of the groups rioting. They were described as the yobs and hoodies which only added more bad press when they were caught looting in their tracksuit bottoms. The minority of young people in the riots were captured in such a negative way that the shorthand stereotypes have caught on and now the youth are a group to fear.
  1. Why does David Buckingham mention Owen Jones and his work Chavs: the demonisation of the working class?
It looks at who is portraying the working class to be the centre of fear and ridicule as they are not calling themselves it. It looks at the difference in class and how the middle class, the ones who write the newspapers are the ones laying down these stereotypes about the people who are "below them".
  1. What is the typical representation of young people – and teenage boys in particular? What did the 2005 IPSOS/MORI survey find?
Looking at the survey results it shows that young people in the news and teenage boys in particular are spoken about very negatively. In particular it focused on violence and it found that 40% of newspapers featuring young people were about violence and 71% of these articles were negative. Other studies had found that with over 7000+ articles published about teenage boys in particular over 72% were negative. All this reinforcement of the youth being a bad and failed group sticks in peoples minds and gives them stereotypes to go on from.
  1. How can Stanley Cohen’s work on Moral Panic be linked to the coverage of the riots?
Cohen suggested that the media play a role in "deviance amplification", they report on the coverage in such a way that is reaches people who might not have thought of becoming involved in the situation before.
  1. What elements of the media and popular culture were blamed for the riots?
Mainly rap music was blamed for young peoples actions. The rap genre was said to influence the youth about views of the police and that violence was "good". Music and pop culture wasn't the only thing to blame, Newspapers themselves could be at blame for glamorising the looting by posting pictures of teens with hoards of loot and not many stories with them getting caught, it may have been a motivating factor to spur on riots around the capital.
  1. How was social media blamed for the riots? What was interesting about the discussion of social media when compared to the Arab Spring in 2011?
Social media platforms that were used during the riots included Twitter and Facebook and also Blackberries messaging service. All were used similarly by the rioters to communicate about where to meet up. The protests that occurred during the Arab Spring event were also helped by the use of social media but it was seen as positive in its use unlike the London riots. Already we can see a difference, The Arab Springs were largely reported on to be about protests, what happened in London was largely called riots. The use of social media to organise political protests is good but to organise rioting against a cause is bad.
  1. The riots generated a huge amount of comment and opinion - both in mainstream and social media. How can the two-step flow theory be linked to the coverage of the riots? 
 The two step flow model is a model used in the media to look at how news/opinions reach the mass media. It starts from the news producers goes to opinion leaders and is then taken on by followers. A lot of people, especially different class groups saw the riots differently, for example the upper class who fit into the socio-economic group of ABC1 may have had different opinions on the riots and some of these people who may have been involved in journalism for newspapers would have shared this. People in the lower classified socio-economic groups like he C2DE's may have had different opinions on the riots and they may have shared this on sites like YouTube or would have been interviewed by news companies.
  1. Alternatively, how might media scholars like Henry Jenkins view the 'tsunami' of blogs, forums and social media comments? Do you agree that this shows the democratisation of the media? 
Henry Jenkins was one who "tends to celebrate this kind of participatory media". I do think that this is a good example of the democratisation of the media because people are free to post where and whatever they like, there is no institution producing the content on peoples personal blogs, however with any service on the internet there is always someone in control so i wouldn't say the people are totally free in there activities on the internet but they do have a certain degree of control which is a fundamental idea about democracy.
  1. What were the right-wing & left wing responses to the causes of the riots?
The right wing responses mainly blamed youngsters and there lack of motivation and commitment to learning. an author for the daily mail gives his strong opinions on what he thinks about young people and in particular how they are amoral. The left wing response also looks at how young people were involved in the riots but it doesn't blame the youth directly, it blames the government for its cut backs and depriving the youth of community centres and the motivation for a full education.
  1. What are your OWN views on the main causes of the riots?
 The main cause of the riots isn't the most obvious thing in my opinion. The shooting started a chain reaction of all the anger and hatred that was building up to the government and police. The cuts by the the Tories and the police violence here and in America influenced people. They just needed a cause to revolt. 
  1. How can capitalism be blamed for the riots? What media theory (from our new/digital media unit) can this be linked to?

  1. Were people involved in the riots given a voice in the media to explain their participation?
Yes but were represented in such a negative way that people only saw the rioters as uncontrollable, amoral youths who had no respect for the community.
  1. In the Guardian website's investigation into the causes of the riots, they did interview rioters themselves. Read this Guardian article from their Reading the Riots academic research project - what causes are outlined by those involved in the disturbances?

  1. What is your own opinion on the riots? Do you have sympathy with those involved or do you believe strong prison sentences are the right approach to prevent such events happening in future?

Friday, 13 January 2017

week 16: story 32

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/jan/12/bbc-sets-up-team-to-debunk-fake-news

BBC sets up team to debunk fake news


BBC logo
The BBC plans to work with Facebook who have also pledged to tackle fake news to help users identify fake news and report/flag it. The team plans to create a fact checking service, they also plan to invest close to £300 million in researching into new languages to expand its data journalism to make news of better quality.

week 16: story 31

https://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2017/jan/13/enterprise-revenues-offer-newspapers-a-lifeline-for-the-future


'Enterprise revenues' offer newspapers a lifeline for the future



This article looks at many options newspapers have of developing in the future. This includes looking at Enterprise revenues and paywalls as well. The author talks about how local newspaper organisations are in decline and have been for years so if they were to make the transition online they would have to do it with a proper business model as because its a local paper its not going to target the mass media like the Guardian does it needs to segment the market and looks at its describable audience.

I am still against news being made chargeable online however, if everyone was doing it and all the local papers then people will pay for the content they value and that would really separate the quality news from the rest. 

Friday, 6 January 2017

week 15: story 30

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/jan/13/the-bbc-will-struggle-to-make-iplayer-as-good-as-netflix


Why the BBC will struggle to make iPlayer as good as Netflix

BBC iPlayer was once a leader in online viewing, but Netflix and Amazon have elbowed their way into the market in a short space of time.
This article from the guardian looks at how BBC's' I player will struggle to keep up with its competition. The boss of BBC, Tony Hall says some serious innovation needs to be done to stay competitive, this includes adding voice recognition and artificial intelligence to provide a better service for us to watch TV shows on demand. The BBC plan to increase their R&D in this sector as they are 5 times the amount Netflix spends on it behind them.

I don't think this is a good strategy for the BBC as they are so far behind the likes of Netflix and Amazon it would be foolish to go against two well established streaming services who dominate the market. 

week 15: story 29

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/jan/11/facebook-journalism-project-news-industry


Facebook unveils measures to promote stronger ties with news industry


Facebook are one of the first companies to hold face to face meetings with the large companies about working collaboratively on providing news. They intend to share their technology with the news industry in the hope of creating closer ties.

Facebook is inviting major news organizations roundtables, hackathons and shared online groups.
I think this is a smart move by Facebook as with the whole issue with fake news is still ongoing the news industry needs to feel like they can trust social media networks again and Facebook is taking the right step forward in creating those ties.

week 14 story 28

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/mediatechnologyandtelecoms/media/12127164/Daily-Mail-publisher-turns-to-price-rise-to-counter-advertising-slump.html

Daily Mail publisher turns to price rise to counter advertising slump


This article from the telegraph tells us that early last year the Daily Mail were set to increase the price of their newspaper by 5p. Since then Newspaper sales have gone into further decline and the Daily Mail has decreased it's circulation of newspapers meaning the price increase wasn't necessary because a fall in newspaper sales was inevitable the price increase just sped things up. A reason why prices were increased was because of a 12% fall in advertising revenues, therefore they needed to make up the lost revenue somewhere.

I don't think increasing the price of a newspaper will do much to cover any costs or lost revenues, however newspapers are a necessity so in business terms it makes the product price insensitive so people may buy newspapers regardless of the price and a price increase of only 5p may not even be noticeable to some people. A Paywall may have been a better option for the daily mail as it has millions of daily viewings and people for the right price would pay to see their news.

week 14: Story 27

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/jan/05/film-and-tv-streaming-and-downloads-overtake-dvd-sales-for-first-time-netflix-amazon-uk

Film and TV ​streaming and downloads overtake DVD sales for first time

This article looks at how in the UK Film and TV streaming & downloads have overtaken DVD sales. DVD sales have been in decline ever since the introduction of on demand movies and streaming. The companies that have benefited the most from this include the likes of Amazon and Netflix who both offer popular streaming services.

Like most things that aren't digital now, these older mediums are going into decline. This is going to be an ongoing thing and more traditional things are going to be replaced with something that can be offered online. 

Consumer spend in £ billion
Physical Retail
Physical Rental
Digital
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2009
2011
2013
2015
Guardian graphic | Source: Entertainment Retailers Association